Sports Letters: Offside and off the wall
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Rakesh Chhabra (Letters, 11 November) is right about the harm done by the offside rule. My suggestion for reform goes like this: Offside will only be given if the defending team appeal for it and the linesman agrees; it is punishable by a direct free-kick to the attacking team (obviously), from the point where the last defender was standing at the time of the offence (or if this was in the penalty area, a penalty kick). A defender guilty, in the referee's opinion, of "persistent offsiding" may be shown the yellow card, and in extreme cases the red one.
If the administrators really believed in the present rule, they would have instructed referees that players who persisted in being caught off- side must be sent off.
Bob Newman
Epsom, Surrey
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments