Sports Letters: Malcolm needs no protection
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: It seems to me that Martin Johnson has always had a bee in his bonnet about West Indian fast bowlers. However, his latest tract on the issue ('ICC must get tough on intimidation', 25 February) is so emotionally manipulative that it could almost be submitted as a Hollywood script. While he justifiably takes the ICC, and for that matter Courtney Walsh, to task, these points are no more than crumbs in the maw of his hyperbole.
Reading his description of Devon Malcolm's ordeal on Wednesday, one could be forgiven for thinking he was talking about Colonel Blimp rather then one of the world's quickest bowlers. He evokes a partially sighted salt-of-the-earth type who has mistakenly wandered out into the middle, there to find himself being used as a dartboard and a coconut shy. Even three dramatic visits from the physio cannot prevent our hapless hero from having his ribs pebbledashed. Finally - oh sweet release - he is dismissed.
However, anyone looking at Malcolm's score might well have remarked 'Dazzle mine eyes, I see three fours]' Anyone capable of dispatching 'this lot', as Mr Johnson calls them, thrice to the ropes can hardly be accused of confusing one end of the bat with the other.
Mr Johnson talks of Walsh going round the wicket as if it were a crime and speaks longingly of 'legal intervention'. As if this weren't enough, he has the gall to accuse the Gleaner of understating the issue. He may rest assured that his report has more than balanced things out.
Yours sincerely,
JONATHAN LALLJEE
London N8
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments