Rangers and SFA set for conflict
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.DAVID MCKINNEY
Relations between the Scottish Football Association and Rangers, strained over the years, could be further damaged with the deliberations of the SFA disciplinary committee into allegations of misconduct at last week's match between Rangers and Aberdeen.
Although John Rowbotham, the referee, took no action his supervisor indicated in his report that Paul Gascoigne should have been sent off for an alleged head-butt on John Inglis and he also suggested John Brown and Alan McLaren of Rangers and Billy Dodds, the Aberdeen striker, be red-carded for a later incident involving all three.
The supervisor suggested he was denied a clear view of the incident involving Gascoigne, but felt a red card would be appropriate because of the presence of intent. The report was considered yesterday by the disciplinary committee.
Rangers are unhappy at the thought that a referee supervisor can sit in judgement on players on disciplinary matters rather than reporting on the actions of the referee. It is also thought that Rangers are unhappy at the fact that the supervisor did not have a clear view of the Gascoigne incident.
The findings of the disciplinary committee could involve all the players mentioned making appearances before the SFA.
The whole scenario might have been different if the SFA allowed video evidence to be taken into consideration. The hypocrisy of that situation, where television is watched by both supervisors and members of committees, could be about to end as the disciplinary committee have opened the door for the use of such evidence to be taken into consideration in future.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments