Racing: Ladbrokes return fire at Savill

Thursday 10 December 1998 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

BRITAIN'S LEADING bookmakers yesterday warned the British Horseracing Board chairman, Peter Savill, to keep his hands off the fixture list.

Ladbrokes insisted that tampering with the programme, as advocated by Savill, would results in trouble for the betting industry. "The 1999 fixture list is the most appropriate there could have been and we want it to stay that way," Ladbrokes spokesman, Andy Clifton, said."We need fixtures at a time when people want to stay in shops. If people don't bet, then the Levy will go down and nobody wants that."

Savill once again showed that he was not the bookmakers' number one fan when he claimed at Tuesday's Gimcrack Dinner that they were selling the industry short. He claimed that more money must be stumped up by the bookmakers to ease racing's financial problems. He also wants to see more fixtures in the evening and on Sundays when bigger crowds are likely.

Clifton added: "The important thing is when racing is staged rather than the number of fixtures. A balance needs to be struck between the needs of the racecourses and what will best suit the Levy."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in