Moynihan seeks tougher drugs bans

 

Robin Scott-Elliot
Tuesday 13 March 2012 01:00 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Colin Moynihan, chairman of the British Olympic Association, believes tougher sanctions have to be imposed on athletes who fail drug tests. The BOA yesterday presented their case to the Court of Arbitration for Sport to uphold their life ban on drug cheats competing in the Olympics. CAS will make their decision by mid-April and if it goes against the BOA it would make the likes of Dwain Chambers and David Millar available for selection.

The BOA are also assembling their proposals for the revision of the world anti-doping code, which have to be submitted by the end of this week, and believe the current two-year ban for first-time offenders is not enough.

"We need tougher sanctions," said Moynihan. "The two-year sanction is ineffective. We will be reinforcing our belief that over and above those sanctions national Olympic committees should have autonomy to determine selection policies, take into account issues such as team moral and integrity when determining selection."

The BOA's defence against the world anti-doping authority's decision to declare their bylaw non-compliant with the anti-doping code leans heavily on a moral argument. Moynihan said yesterday that having the ability not to select drug cheats was similar to refusing to pick athletes involved in match-fixing or racist behaviour.

"If someone was proved to have been involved in match fixing I'm sure the BOA would take a very tough line and not select them," he said. "Any overt racist behaviour that damaged the moral and the performance of team-mates or the team would be unacceptable."

Moynihan declared himself "cautiously optimistic" after the four-and-a-half hour hearing in central London, but conceded the outcome would be determined by "finer points of law" rather than any moral argument.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in