IOC plays down London budget fears

Matthew Beard
Thursday 30 November 2006 01:00 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The International Olympic Committee has come to the defence of the organisers of the London Games, saying it is "very happy" with current progress and "not unduly concerned" about the budget.

Denis Oswald, the chairman of the IOC coordination commission, blamed much of the adverse publicity over cost overruns on "misinformation" and said there would be no "knee-jerk reaction" from the IOC to figures that have emerged over the last few weeks.

"London have made a lot of progress and the timelines of the project are going according to schedule" Oswald told the IOC's executive board meeting in Kuwait.

Concerns about costs of the 2012 Games were sparked by the recent resignation of Jack Lemley, chairman of the Olympic Delivery Authority, who said they would rise "exponentially". Last week the Olympics minister, Tessa Jowell, confirmed that the budget had already risen by £900m to £3.3bn, not including the cost of wider regeneration projects in the Stratford area.

Oswald said it was important to separate the cost of building Games venues and infrastructure from wider regeneration projects, claiming that the increases had "nothing to do with the Games". He added: "The Government investments budget only partly concerns Olympics projects. I believe the increases mentioned have nothing to do with the Games and can easily be explained."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in