Olympic Games: Harrison allowed to take on Edwards

Mike Rowbottom
Wednesday 17 July 1996 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

One of Jonathan Edwards's main triple jump rivals, Kenny Harrison, has been added to the United States team on deadline after a successful appeal to the International Amateur Athletic Federation.

United States' officials had told the 31-year-old former world champion he had not achieved the qualifying mark of 16.85 metres as his indoor performances this year did not count.

But Harrison, whose victory at the US trials with 18.01 metres was invalid for qualifying purposes because of wind assistance, took his case to the international authority, which ruled in his favour.

Edwards will now have to face two of the three other triple jumpers who have surpassed 18 metres, as Harrison joins the reigning Olympic champion, Mike Conley.

Harrison, whose indoor mark of 17.05 metres at Reno in February eventually proved sufficient to allow him to compete here, was angry about the actions taken - or not taken - by the US Track and Field authorities.

After his opening jump at the trials, he passed on his other five attempts, believing that he had done enough to win and that his indoor marks would give him the qualifying distance.

"During the competition, with our coaches there, someone should have come down after they saw me passing three jumps and said: 'Hey, you don't have the qualifying mark. You might want to take an extra jump.' I don't think they even went through the effort of checking."

Harrison's motivation to do well stems as much from a desire to beat Conley as anything else. "Conley's name overshadows everything I have ever done," he said. "To get the attention, I have to do something extra special. The thing he has that I don't is an Olympic gold."

In the meantime, pressure has been growing upon Mike Turner - the doctor who told BBC's Panorama programme this week that 75 per cent of athletes in Atlanta had probably taken performance-enhancing drugs - to back up his claims.

Turner, who is a member of the British Olympic Association's medical committee as a representative of the Lawn Tennis Association, has been asked by the British Athletic Federation either to substantiate his comments by Friday, or consider his position on the BOA committee.

Malcolm Brown, Britain's team doctor, added his weight to the argument by hinting that he would resign from the BOA committee if Turner did not.

"The team are incensed by these comments," said the BAF spokesman Tony Ward. "He is being cheap. A lot of mud has been flung at us over the years, and we have been too tolerant.

"This is the most tested British team we have sent to a major championships in the history of athletics. We have conducted more than 300 tests in the last three to four months, and all of the 80-strong team are clean. That is fact, not innuendo."

Dean Capobianco, the Australian sprinter suspended after testing positive for the banned steroid stanozolol, has taken part in an independent hearing by telephone link-up and is awaiting the decision of the QC in charge of the case, Robert Ellicott.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in