OLYMPIC GAMES: Challenge for athletes as UK Sport drops the cash baton

Mike Rowbottom
Thursday 03 February 2005 01:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

BRITISH ATHLETICS was yesterday coming to terms with a bizarre windfall from its Olympic successes in Athens as UK Sport announced that the number of elite performers receiving Lottery funding for the next four years would be cut by more than half.

UK Athletics will see its financial support reduced from pounds 8.3m to pounds 7.2m, with the total of competitors receiving financial aid dropping from 82 to 40. This will constitute a challenge for Dave Collins, the new performance director of UK Athletics, when he takes up his post in March.

Athletics had set a target of between five and seven medals in Athens. They earned four - a bronze from Kelly Sotherton, and golds from the men's sprint relay team and Kelly Holmes in the 800 and 1500m.

"We are disappointed at receiving less funding," Dave Moorcroft, chief executive of UK Athletics, said, "particularly as one of the stated aims of the British Olympic Association is to get into the top five nations in the world by the time of the Beijing Games, and in Athens we were either third in terms of medals or fifth on points. So we feel we've done our bit, and to be rewarded with less money is disappointing."

UK Sport has announced a pounds 75m funding package for Olympic sports in the build-up to Beijing 2008 - an overall pounds 5m increase - but are now financing fewer medal hopefuls and also targeting sports with the best chances of winning medals in four years' time.

The fact is, however, that more British athletes won gold in Athens than in any previous Games since those in Los Angeles in 1984. And the benefit to the sport of the victories earned by Holmes and the men's relay team have been, in terms of profile, enormous.

"The medals we expected we didn't get, and the medals we didn't expect we got. That is the unpredictable nature of this sport," Moorcroft said, adding that, had the numbers of competitors eligible for Lottery funding been at its new level before the Athens Games, it would have been "quite likely" that Sotherton, who made huge, late improvements after switching from long jump to heptathlon in 2003, would not have been supported.

The other big loser was gymnastics, which saw its funding reduced from pounds 3.6m to pounds 1.8m, and its competitors supported from 14 to eight. The sport had a target of three medals in Athens, but failed to win any.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in