FIA sets Coulthard appeal date

Ap
Tuesday 28 March 2000 00:00 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Motor racing's world governing body will convene its International Court of Appeal in Paris on Monday to hear McLaren's protest over the disqualification of driver David Coulthard from second place in the Brazilian Grand Prix.

FIA spokesman Francesco Longanesi said a decision was expected as early as Tuesday by the appeals panel, which is expected to be made up of at least three jurors.

Coulthard placed second behind Ferrari's Michael Schumacher in Sunday's Brazilian Grand Prix but was disqualified when stewards ruled the front wing of his car was two millimetres (.08 inch) out of tolerance.

Five months ago, the FIA's same appeal body seemed to bend its rules by reinstating Ferrari's 1-2 finish in the Malaysian Grand Prix after stewards ruled aerodynamic deflectors were out of compliance by one centimetre.

Coulthard, who is hoping for the same kind of leniency, hinted at favoritism in the FIA's decisions.

"It all depends on how the world championship lies and who is supposed to be winning at the time," Coulthard said. "But we'll have to see what the appeal court says. It's one of those things that rules are rules. Sometimes, though, it feels like the regulations just don't make sense."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in