Mistake gives Modahl hope

Norman Fo
Sunday 19 March 1995 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

DIANE MODAHL'S appeal against a four-year ban imposed when she was found guilty of using the performance-enhancing drug, testosterone, is to be heard by the British Athletic Federation early next month, by which time the International Amateur Athletic Federation may have had to admit that some laboratory testing for the drug is flawed.

For the first time, a laboratory has confessed to the IAAF that it made a mistake in its second examination of a specimen. Ulrike Heidelmann, a German discus competitor, awaits the conclusions of the German athletic federation (DLV) on whether or not she was a cheat. Like Modahl, she was accused of taking testosterone, the male hormone. But the Rome laboratory where the specimen was examined has contradicted its own findings on her B sample, saying the level was significantly lower than they had said.

Christopher Winner, representing the IAAF, said yesterday: "The laboratory confirmed the results, then last month they sent a terse fax to us and the DLV to say the second sample was no longer considered to be positive. My guess is that the Germans will lift their suspension. We don't know as yet why the laboratory changed its conclusions. We assume it has to do with the re-examination of the steroid profile". Professor Arne Ljungqvist, Chairman of the IAAF's Medical Commitee said: "In my 25 years I have seen only one or two cases of B samples contradicting A and usually that was procedural error and not medical."

Winner added: "We will be looking into the lab, which is accredited by the International Olympic Committee and is the main Italian sporting anti- doping centre. We will be looking for a full explanation because it's unacceptable, especially after months passed before they changed their mind. It's a serious matter. We have to get to the bottom of it. But we are not yet drawing conclusions that have implications for the Modahl case, except that testosterone is involved in both. For all we know the second sample could have been dropped or contaminated in some way."

The long delay since Modahl was banned following specimens being tested in a Lisbon laboratory last June is believed to have allowed her lawyers, her husband, Vicente, and the British team doctor, Malcolm Brown, to gather evidence to have her suspension reduced or even waived. The fact that the IAAF now has to question the work of one of its top testing stations can only encourage them. Modahl continues to plead innocence, and her husband says that when the appeal is heard there will be "an innocent explanation" for an astonishingly high testosterone level.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in