Managers quick to defend Coppell
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The League Managers' Association yesterday leapt to the defence of Steve Coppell as critics called for him to resign from the Premier League Commission of Inquiry into transfer payments.
Coppell, the former Crystal Palace manager who is part of the three-man panel investigating allegations of "bungs" in transfer deals, has come in for fierce criticism for comments about the Arsenal manager, George Graham, who faced the inquiry last week.
Arsenal yesterday pronounced themselves "extremely disturbed" by the comments, which they said prejudged the outcome of the inquiry, which is probing allegations that Graham took a £285,000 "bung" during the signing of the Danish midfielder, John Jensen .
esh Coppell was backed by the Premier League chief executive, Rick Parry, who, with QC Robert Reid, makes up the Commission. It was also confirmed there would be no change in the make-up of the investigating body.
Coppell, the chief executive of the LMA, was yesterday backed by that body's chairman, Howard Wilkinson. The Leeds manager said: "Let's make it perfectly clear he was not speaking as a member of the Commission when he made the alleged comment.
"The Commission hadn't sat and Steve hadn't even seen the documents. What he said was that, if the facts were as stated in the media, it would appear to be an open-and-shut case - with the emphasis on the `if'.
"Steve's comments reflected a hypothetical outcome to a hypothetical question. It's the task of the commission to establish what's fact and what's fiction. It will do that more efficiently if Steve provides a manager's input."
The Commission will not be sitting again until after Christmas.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments