Letter: Crackers, Jack

C. Adam-Reynolds
Wednesday 10 November 1999 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: I was dismayed to read Jack Rowell's criticism of England's defeat by South Africa. What does it achieve? On the day England were beaten by a better side whose tactics paid off. On another day they may not have. To criticise England for not having a strategy assumes that if they had a different one they would have won. Mr Rowell seems to have forgotten that times, and situations, move on.

In addition, to concede five drop goals to a specialist kicker may well be unfortunate or even careless, but it is far more palatable than conceding one to a No 8 forward from 40 odd metres in open play even though he was Zinzan Brooke.

C ADAM-REYNOLDS,

Maidstone, Kent

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in