Hasty BR sale cost taxpayers millions

Randeep Ramesh
Thursday 05 March 1998 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

THE last Tory Government's eagerness to sell off British Rail's operations as quickly as possible cost taxpayers hundreds of millions of pounds, a report by the National Audit office revealed yesterday.

The Department of Transport received pounds 1.8 billion from the sale of the three rolling stock leasing companies. Yet within months they were re- sold for a total of pounds 2.65 billion in deals which made multi-millionaires of some managers, writes Randeep Ramesh, Transport Correspondent.

The first sale - of Porterbrook leasing in 1996 to bus giant Stagecoach - came just 7 months after it was privatised. The deal made Porterbrook's managing director Sandy Anderson more than pounds 33m.

According to the NAO report: "The speed with which such significant gains were realised were unusual". The last administration also vetoed any "profit tax" that could have seen any quick gains returned to the taxpayer.

The report also highlights concerns that under the current framework, no new trains can easily be rented.

"The Franchising director has serious concerns that bidders for new franchises will have little alternative but to lease the majority of the existing stock in use," the report says.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in