Athletics is among losers as funding body cuts 2012 budget

Amol Rajan
Thursday 04 December 2008 01:00 GMT
Comments
(PA)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Eight Olympic sports face uncertain futures after UK Sport, the government's funding body for elite sport in Britain, announced across the board cuts yesterday.

Fencing, handball, shooting, water polo, weightlifting, table tennis, volleyball and wrestling have all lost out after the government failed to procure £100m of private funding promised in the March 2006 Budget. All eight have yet to be told a confirmed figure for their funding.

An extra £21m from the Lottery and £29m from the exchequer halved the funding black hole but cuts of £50m had to be found. Athletics, which produced only one gold medal in Beijing with Christine Ohuruogu in the 400m, was a notable loser in yesterday's announcements by Andy Burnham, Secretary of State for Culture, Media, and Sport. UK Athletics will have their budget reduced from £26.5m to £25.1m over the next four years.

UK Sport said that the allocations were based on a "no compromise" strategy of investment, with sports most likely to reap medals rewarded.

Hockey, taekwondo, boxing, archery, and synchronised swimming all benefited from the new budgets, but none more so than basketball, which received a 136 per cent increase from £3.7m to £8.7m. Rowing, which brought home six medals for Team GB, is the best funded Olympic sport, with £27.47m over the next four years.

Britain's cyclists were rewarded for their record medal haul of 14 in Beijing – which included eight golds – with a 21 per cent increase in funding, up from £22.1m to £26.9m. Sue Campbell, chair of UK Sport, said: "While it is disappointing that we are not today able to offer the full level of resources to all sports, we can only invest what we have available to us."

But Andy Hunt, the chief executive of the British Olympic Association, derided the package, saying: "It is disappointing that, despite extensive lobbying, we find ourselves three months after the most successful Olympics for Great Britain in 100 years, where the government has failed to honour their funding promise."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in