Athletics: Banning threat to Chambers
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.UK Athletics is urgently considering a policy review that would include banning competitors who return after serious doping offences from representing their country.
Such a policy would affect Dwain Chambers, whose plans to resume his sprinting career after the collapse of his American football ambitions have aroused strong antipathy within domestic athletics.
The former European 100m champion, who has already made one comeback after serving a two-year doping ban, learned yesterday that he was ineligible to compete at this weekend's Southern Indoor Championships at Lee Valley, where he wanted to gain a 60 metres qualifying time for next month's World Indoor Championship trials, because he had missed the entry deadline of 8 January.
Chambers, who automatically dropped off the International Association of Athletics Federation's dope-testing register in July last year because he was playing for the now defunct NFL Europe team Hamburg Sea Devils, is legally entitled to resume his athletics career. But there is a feeling within the domestic federation – which is still owed a share of the £200,000 prize-money Chambers was asked to pay back in the wake of his ban – that a moral stand has to be taken to prevent an athlete who has not been regularly dope-tested lining up against competitors who have been subject to frequent unannounced testing.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments