Liverpool setback as Chelsea demand increased compensation for Dominic Solanke after World Cup performances

The 19-year-old agreed to join Jurgen Klopp's side prior to the World Cup

Jack Austin
Thursday 15 June 2017 10:12 BST
Comments
Who is Liverpool's new signing Dominic Solanke?

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Liverpool could be forced to pay up to £10m compensation for Dominic Solanke, with Chelsea willing to take the Reds to court if they cannot find a settlement.

The youngster, who won the Golden Ball on the way to helping England win the Under-20 World Cup this month, has agreed to join the Reds after Chelsea let his contract run out this summer.

However, as he is under the age of 24, the Blues are entitled to compensation over his transfer.

Liverpool originally offered a package of £3m compensation which was laughed out of the room by the Stamford Bridge hierarchy, who, according to the Evening Standard, are demanding £10m.

Chelsea believe his performance at the Under-20 World Cup, where he finished as second-top goalscorer with four goals, has dramatically increased his value.

Initially the Blues were asking for £8m, but they now want an inflated fee of £2m more.

If the two clubs can’t agree a deal between them then it will go to an independent tribunal to be settled.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in