Sir Alex Ferguson 'refuses to believe' Chelsea side of story

Manchester United manager hits out at league leaders, saying Mark Clattenburg may never lose stigma of accusation

Ian Herbert
Saturday 03 November 2012 01:00 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Manchester United and Chelsea were in a state of open warfare over the Mark Clattenburg affair last night, with Sir Alex Ferguson declaring that he is ready to testify in the referee's defence and that other managers should do so, in the firm belief that he will not be found guilty of racially abusing John Obi Mikel during last Sunday's match at Stamford Bridge.

The Manchester United manager defended Clattenburg in the strongest possible terms yesterday, declaring that no official in the modern game would "stoop" to the kind of abuse that the Nigerian claimed after the game in which the official sent off two Chelsea players, and warned that the referee may never escape the stigma of the 25-year-old's accusation. Ferguson, whose side face Arsenal at Old Trafford this lunchtime, also reinforced the Arsenal manager Arsène Wenger's claim that Chelsea should have kept their incendiary complaints private.

"I have had my run-ins with referees over the years, as you well know," Ferguson said. "I have been fined a few times, but I just think that what has happened over the past week is unthinkable. It's an accusation which, even in the heat of the moment, shouldn't be made. You can't do that." Asked if he was prepared to stand up in Clattenburg's defence, should investigations by the Football Association and Metropolitan Police lead to action being taken against the 37-year-old, Ferguson said: "All of us."

Ferguson attacked Chelsea, stating that "most people" would agree that the club should have allowed tempers to cool before going public on their claim against Clattenburg. Initial claims that Juan Mata was verbally abused by the referee have already been dropped. Wenger was careful on Thursday not to attack the substance of Chelsea's complaint – only the public way it was made – and Chelsea's manager, Roberto di Matteo, warned that the United manager's comments might backfire. "He likes to talk about other clubs. We tend not to," Di Matteo said. "We'll take into consideration what other people say and use it as a motivational tool for ourselves."

United and Chelsea have history where claims of racial insults are concerned. The Old Trafford club's claims that a member of Chelsea's groundstaff, Sam Bethell, had racially abused Patrice Evra, were rejected by the Football Association in 2008 and the French defender was banned for four matches and fined £15,000 after the FA strongly criticised the reliability of United's evidence.

But Ferguson, who said he had asked his players if they had heard Clattenburg abuse Chelsea players and said that they had heard nothing, declared the idea of a referee indulging in such abuse was beyond the bounds of belief. "I don't believe Mark Clattenburg would make any comments like that," he said. "I refuse to believe it. I think it's unthinkable in the modern climate. I just don't believe it – it's a simple as that. There's no way a referee would stoop to that and I'm convinced of that. I've never heard of a player ever coming to me in the last 15 years saying a referee has sworn in a game. Ever. So that's where I stand. I don't believe it." He said that it should be for the FA to decide whether Chelsea should be subjected to any punishment if the allegation proves unfounded.

The latest twist in the racism in football story has led the Prime Minister, David Cameron, to declare that the FA should be doing more to tackle racism. That prompted Gary Neville, the England coach and Sky TV pundit, to take to Twitter to declare that the game was doing enough. Neville said that politicians should stick to their own jobs and that racism was a "societal" issue. Asked if the Conservative Party and Cameron were seeking to make cheap political capital, Ferguson said: "I think we are doing our best. There is a genuine drive to take racism out of our game. Unfortunately, we have had a couple of issues of race-related incidents, but when you look back over 25 years, there have been amazing improvements. You have to keep on progressing, bit by bit, to drive it out of the game completely."

Ferguson's comments drew cynicism from some quarters and the United manager's relationship with Clattenburg has certainly not been as difficult as with most officials. Tottenham Hotspur were denied a victory at Old Trafford in January 2005 when Clattenburg ruled that Pedro Mendes' shot had not crossed the line. He also failed to spot Wayne Rooney's elbow at Wigan Athletic's James McCarthy last year and therefore did not dismiss the United striker.

Ferguson said that Clattenburg had done Chelsea a favour by not issuing a red card to Fernando Torres for a high-footed tackle last Sunday. "When you think about it, Mark actually does them a favour because he should have sent Torres off in the first half," Ferguson said. "By trying to keep a lid on it, on a combustible game, all these big games require good handling by the officials. But by sending him off for a second yellow card, Torres only misses one game, so he is free for the next two league games.

"They are not well endowed with strikers, Chelsea, so the referee has done them a favour. Those next two league games could be important to Chelsea's season – Torres might score the winner against Swansea this weekend. In a way Clattenburg has done them a favour."

Captain Vidic ruled out until Christmas period

Sir Alex Ferguson says Manchester United captain Nemanja Vidic may not return from knee surgery until late December – a month longer than was initially thought.

The 30-year-old Serbia defender missed the final five months of last season after rupturing a cruciate ligament in his right knee. He then had surgery on the meniscus in the same knee in September that was expected to keep him out for two months.

But Ferguson said yesterday that he believed a return for Vidic later this month was now unlikely.

“I think we’re talking around December for Vidic. Maybe around Christmas time,” said Ferguson.

United have other injury problems in defence as well with England internationals Phil Jones and Chris Smalling both unavailable until later this month. Rio Ferdinand is set to partner Jonny Evans against Arsenal today.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in