Manchester City hopes of Champions League glory harmed as they sink to Uefa’s third tier
Etihad club could share group with Bayern and Real next season – and United and Arsenal also suffer after poor campaigns
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Manchester City’s hopes of making any immediate headway in the Champions League have hit a new obstacle, as Uefa’s new rules for next season’s competition confirm that the club may be relegated to the third tier of seeds if they qualify.
With little evidence that the club are looking to do anything but either persist with Manuel Pellegrini or turn to Patrick Vieira as manager, while waiting for Pep Guardiola’s availability in one year’s time, City could conceivably face both Guardiola’s Bayern Munich and Real Madrid in the same group stage next season.
That is a result of Uefa pressing ahead with plans for a seeding change to reward national league winners – making the titleholders in the seven highest-ranked countries plus the defending Champions League winners the top seeds in each of the eight groups.
The new rules are also likely to punish Arsenal and Manchester United, by relegating both to second-seed status. But City – who will face a tricky Champions League qualifying round draw unless they displace Manchester United in third – are likely to slip to third seeds, based on their probable position outside Europe’s top 16 clubs in the governing body’s rankings.
City have dropped out of the top 16 according to the latest co-efficients. Juventus and Porto have both climbed into the top 16, squeezing City out. Despite their position as defending Premier League champions, the club’s continued struggle in Europe and a difficult domestic season have damaged their ranking.
The new seeding system should elevate league-leading Juventus and Zenit St Petersburg to top seeds, plus France’s champions – with Chelsea likely to be the British representative among the elite group. If the Champions League victors also win their national title then the eighth top-seeded team will be the recently-crowned Dutch champions PSV Eindhoven, who are ranked 30th in Uefa’s club standings.
On present placements, Arsenal, Atletico Madrid and Porto will drop in status in the August draw. Arsenal, who are second in the Premier League and 10 points behind Chelsea, were seeded first in their group this time round, ahead of Borussia Dortmund, Galatasaray and Anderlecht, as were Atletico Madrid and Porto.
Though City had expected this news, it comes as another blow at a time when obstacles to their development keep materialising. Any scintilla of hope that Guardiola might be willing to leave Bayern for the Etihad this summer vanished with the 6-1 annihilation of Porto in Germany on Tuesday night.
The sense remains at City that talk of a Pellegrini sacking may be premature. Though the Napoli manager Rafael Benitez is ready to take on a Premier League job again this summer, there is no sense that City have been tempted by his extraordinary European record – which he will defend against Wolfsburg in the Europa League tonight.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments