IoS exclusive: Why Chelsea risked reputation on ref racism claim
They feared being accused of a cover-up following Terry case
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Chelsea feared being accused of a racism cover-up if they failed to report the alleged abuse of John Obi Mikel by referee Mark Clattenburg, it can be revealed today.
The club were placed under pressure when confronted by claims from Mikel and Ramires that Clattenburg had called Mikel a "monkey", and believed that some press reporters were already aware of the incident. They feared that failure to act would leave the club open to the charge that, as with the John Terry incident, they did not take racism allegations seriously
For the first time a detailed picture has emerged of what motivated the club to take the unprecedented decision to go public on the flare-up following last Sunday's Premier League game with Manchester United, and subsequently to report the matter to the FA.
The Independent on Sunday has spoken to a highly placed source at Chelsea, who admits that many of the club's actions were governed by the Terry racism storm. But we can also reveal that:
* Mikel claims to have personally heard Clattenburg call him a monkey. It was previously reported that only Ramires heard the word.
* Chelsea were mindful of FA rule E14 which says a club must report possible misconduct incidents.
* The club also took into account the 2010 Equality Act which imposes a duty of care on employers.
* Chelsea chairman Bruce Buck, who is also a lawyer, was centrally involved in all decisions.
* The club may say in their defence that referees sometimes cover their mikes when talking to players.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments