Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Velcro's dramatic save leads football to lift ban on hijab

New pinless headscarf persuades world body to reverse ruling

Andrew Warshaw
Sunday 04 March 2012 01:00 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

What is banned in French schools and Turkish libraries, but allowed on the football pitch? Answer: the hijab, which women will soon be allowed to wear when they play the beautiful game.

The International Football Association Board, world soccer's rule-making body, unanimously agreed to overturn a ban on the headscarf at its meeting in Surrey yesterday.

But it took the intervention of a Jordanian prince, Premier League footballers – and a new Velcro-based design – to convince the guardians of the game that Islamic women should be granted their wish. It is expected they will be able to wear the hijab while playing once the decision has been ratified in July. the ban was introduced in 2007.

The issue has sparked heated discussion in the United Nations and proved controversial with Muslim women teams. Last year, Iran was prevented from playing their 2012 Olympic second round qualifier against Jordan because they refused to remove their hijabs before kickoff. Iran had topped their group in the first round of Olympic qualifiers, but were handed 3-0 defeats as a penalty, ending their dreams of qualifying for London 2012.

Yesterday's ruling by the board – made up of four representatives from the world governing body Fifa and four from British home associations – was a triumph for the campaign, led by Jordan's Prince Ali Bin Al Hussein. The prince, a senior Fifa executive, had warned it would be a retrograde step to turn down his proposal. He argued that preventing Muslim women players from covering their heads amounted to unfair prejudice, a stance supported by United Nations officials and Premier League players, including the Reading striker Jason Roberts and Tottenham players Louis Saha and Ryan Nelsen.

Prince Ali, who has suggested long hair was more likely to cause injury on the field than a headscarf, has previously said he had not found records of any hijab-related injuries in women's football.

A parallel has been drawn between the ban and Chelsea's male goalkeeper Petr Cech, who has worn a protective cap since sustaining a serious head injury. If Cech was not in breach of the rules, how could the hijab be?

The new design, fastened with Velcro instead of pins, persuaded Fifa that safety was no longer an issue, bringing soccer in line with rugby and track and field events.

Some Islamic countries frown upon women playing sport, but Prince Ali, 36, said: "I'm confident we will see many delighted players returning to the game. This piece of cloth is simply an issue of modesty; it has nothing to do with religion."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in