Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Clubs in new wage-restraint talks

Premier League teams ready to curb player earnings but won't agree to salary cap

Steve Tongue
Saturday 13 October 2012 21:56 BST
Comments
Advocates of change hope it would prevent a mega-rich owner like Abramovich at Chelsea from buying success by paying inflated sums in wages and transfer fees
Advocates of change hope it would prevent a mega-rich owner like Abramovich at Chelsea from buying success by paying inflated sums in wages and transfer fees (AFP)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

New regulations that would change the face of English football are being debated by the 20 Premier League clubs, a majority of whom are understood to favour far greater financial controls, especially on wages.

The measures would bring a degree of sanity to a world in which barely one-third of the country's top clubs manage to make a profit despite receiving huge sums from broadcasting and commercial activities. One effect that advocates of change hope for would be to prevent a mega-rich owner like those at Chelsea and Manchester City from buying success by paying inflated sums in wages and transfer fees.

There is little support for the salary cap proposed by Wigan's Dave Whelan, which is regarded as impractical if not illegal, but other measures discussed include an annual limit on wage rises and a ceiling on the percentage of income spent on salaries. The latter plan is supported by West Ham's David Gold, who says: "Wage capping is almost communism, that's abhorrent. Most Premier League clubs support Uefa's Financial Fair Play, but I think what clubs want is something that works alongside that to stop the ever upward spiralling wages."

In the Football League, clubs now face a transfer embargo if they spend more than 55 per cent (in League Two) or 65 per cent (League One) of their income on salaries. Championship clubs will be subject to a form of Financial Fair Play and face fines for not complying from 2014.

On the latest available figures, from the 2010-11 season, only seven Premier League clubs – Arsenal, Fulham, Manchester United, Newcastle, Tottenham, West Bromwich Albion and (relegated) Wolves – made a profit. Another seven, including Chelsea, Liverpool and Manchester City, made such large losses they would have failed the Financial Fair Play rules being introduced by Uefa. That is despite each of the 20 clubs making a minimum of £39m a season from broadcasting alone.

A Premier League spokesman said yesterday: "Income is rising while debt is falling and it's from this position of strength that the 20 clubs are currently discussing what further financial regulation might look like. At least 14 clubs will have to agree before anything's implemented."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in