Diving: Why Don't They... make diving more interesting?

Peter Barton
Thursday 19 November 1998 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

TO MANY people, the American Greg Louganis will not be remembered for being a diving gold medallist at the Seoul Olympics. Louganis, perhaps the world's most memorable diver, sticks in the memory because he smacked his head of the diving board and landed in the water like a sack of spuds.

Diving, like a host of other worthy-but-dull, judge-based Olympic events, is boring. Yes, the divers are technically accomplished and, no, I don't know anybody that could do a double somersault with twist and pike and enter the water like an arrow (or a barrow in Louganis' case), but so what? Diving is no more than circus tumblers at the swimming baths. Can they not do more? Why not diving darts or clay pigeon diving? Or team clay pigeon diving? For instance, divers would have to run off the end of the high platform and jump through a moving target. Points would be scored according to the degree of difficulty in spearing each target - the dart option could be used so divers had to score, say, 301 points and finish on an especially narrow hoop or incorporate a somersault in their dive.

The team event would allow competing countries to play their specialist divers for particular dives, rather like the specialists required in American football - the 6ft 8in, narrow-shouldered Cuban for the tight hoops, the squat Hungarian bomber for the bull's-eye shot. It would certainly help the TV networks develop characters in the sport.

Of course, as the competition progresses the difficulty of the dive could increase. The height of the board could be raised, the moving targets could move faster or the divers could attempt the dive "blind" (leaping from the platform without seeing the target, with only their team-mates on hand to shout "jump"). And in a complete change to the scoring, bonus marks could be awarded for those who make the biggest splash. These changes would produce a much clearer result for viewers and it would open up diving to competitors of all shapes and sizes. It may even throw up a new diving star, and wouldn't Greg Louganis like that?

All iconoclastic contributions to this column - on any sport - should be sent to Sports Desk, The Independent, 1 Canada Square, Canary Wharf, London E14 5DL. Faxes to 0171-293 2894 or e-mail to sport@independent.co.uk. Contributions may be edited for length and clarity.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in