Dr Richard Freeman tells medical tribunal he was unaware testosterone enhanced performance

Dr Freeman has admitted 18 of the 22 charges against him but denies ‘knowing or believing’ the Testogel he ordered to the National Cycling Centre in 2011 would be given to a rider

Lawrence Ostlere
Thursday 19 November 2020 12:09 GMT
Comments
Dr Richard Freeman 'wasn't well enough' to proceed with disciplinary action against him
Dr Richard Freeman 'wasn't well enough' to proceed with disciplinary action against him

Dr Richard Freeman, the former British Cycling and Team Sky doctor, has told a medical tribunal he was unaware of testosterone’s performance-enhancing benefits when he ordered the prohibited substance to the National Cycling Centre in May 2011.

Dr Freeman has admitted 18 of the 22 charges against him but denies “knowing or believing” the Testogel would be given to a rider, and insists he did not lie about the order to British Cycling and UK Anti-Doping. 

At his fitness-to-practice hearing, Dr Freeman was asked by tribunal chair Mr Neil Dalton about the drug culture within cycling in 2011 and whether the medic would have known testosterone could be used to boost performance.

"No, I wouldn't have, really," he told a Medical Practitioners Tribunal Service on the final day of his cross-examination that has stretched into a seventh week. "I'm not a cycling fan, I'm a doctor in sports medicine.

"We (the team) were focused on managing athletes and there was this mantra that we were a clean team and it was never discussed."

Read more: Dr Richard Freeman tribunal explained

When later pressed on his comments by GMC QC Simon Jackson, Dr Freeman insisted the issue of doping had never arisen between himself and former British Cycling medical director Dr Steve Peters.

Dr Freeman, who had been in his post for 17 months when he ordered the Testogel to the Manchester Velodrome, said: "I came into cycling quite fresh.

"The main interest in endurance cycling was blood doping. Dr Peters and I never discussed doping."

The hearing has already heard about how Freeman lied to colleagues that the package was sent by mistake, and that he was told by Dr Peters to get an acknowledgement of the error from supplier Fit4Sport.

While Dr Peters has told the GMC he asked for confirmation straight away and another three times over the summer of 2011, Dr Freeman contends he had only been asked that October.

"My recollection was we didn't discuss it at the time because it wasn't a critical incident," Dr Freeman said. "It was much later in October. He wanted that (acknowledgement) for his sticky file.

"I stand by the fact I was asked to get a sticky email for the email folder, even if it challenges Dr Peters' account."

Asked if there was a reason why there was a reason Dr Peters might have a different recollection of events, Dr Freeman added: "I'm in a difficult position because I don't believe Dr Peters has a false memory.

"I would never challenge the integrity or honesty of Dr Peters.

"Dr Peters was my mentor, if he had asked me for a letter, I would have got it.

"He is a stickler for detail. I would have expected him to drill down on me and I would have done that to get his approval."

Dr Freeman alleges he was bullied into ordering the Testogel by former British Cycling and Team Sky technical director Shane Sutton to treat erectile disfunction, claims the Australian firmly denies.

"I didn't think he had underlying medical condition but I thought he did have an underlying need to enhance, improve or maintain sexual performance," Dr Freeman said.

Dr Freeman says he had "lost power" in his doctor-patient relationship with Sutton and only when the package was delivered and subsequently discovered by former British Cycling physiotherapist Phil Burt and Dr Peters did the medic decide to change the dynamic.

"When Dr Peters said get (the package) off the premises I thought 'get a grip' and take back the doctor-patient power differential," Dr Freeman added.

"I stood up for myself. I couldn't tell Dr Peters what went on, I couldn't break Shane Sutton's confidentiality, it was a real wake-up call."

The tribunal has been adjourned until Friday.

Additional reporting by PA

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in