Kevin Pietersen omission irrelevant to England's World Twenty20 chances says Paul Collingwood

 

Pa
Tuesday 18 September 2012 11:41 BST
Comments
Kevin Pietersen is likely to join the Big Bash if left out by England
Kevin Pietersen is likely to join the Big Bash if left out by England (Getty Images)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Kevin Pietersen remains the vexed issue England must solve to go forward in Test cricket, but his complicated life will have no bearing on their chances of retaining the ICC World Twenty20.

England's selectors prepare to announce today whether Pietersen can return after his summer of turmoil into their Test plans - while the man himself is due in Sri Lanka to broadcast his opinions on the World Cup.

But his presence, or otherwise, in squads for India or television studios in Colombo will be an irrelevance to England's hopes of defending their title - according to Paul Collingwood, the man who led his country to Twenty20 success two years ago.

That remains England's only International Cricket Council global trophy to date, after almost 40 years of trying.

Pietersen was man of the tournament in the Caribbean.

But Collingwood reasons that the superstar batsman's early defection this time round - he retired from all international limited-overs cricket almost four months ago, before reversing his decision to no avail - has helped England plan without him.

"I don't think it's a distraction to the Twenty20 form of the game, because he made that decision to retire from one-day cricket - which he knew was then going to keep him out of the Twenty20 side," said Collingwood.

"That plan has been there from the start, and that is his doing."

In Test cricket, the former one-day international and Twenty20 captain senses Pietersen's controversial breakdown of relations with coach Andy Flower is more of a problem.

"It has certainly been distracting from the Test point of view," he said.

"You don't want to lose your most skilful player - but if it's detrimental to the team when he does play, that is where strong decisions are made."

In the here and now, England will concentrate - under Stuart Broad's captaincy - exclusively on the sprint format.

They began yesterday with a nine-run warm-up win over Australia, and Collingwood is confident the young guns present will be up to the task.

"You look at the players that have come in, and it's properly exciting," he said.

"You look at the batting line-up now; they are young players but very skilful and powerful players.

"Ask any attack in the world, and they will not be looking forward to coming up against those batters.

"I think we have a better batting line-up than we did last time - and that is without KP in it.

"Your (Craig) Kieswetters, your (Michael) Lumbs are two years better. They have a lot more experience. I think we have a great chance."

Collingwood confidently expects at least one individual to fill the gap left by Pietersen.

"KP won player of the tournament last time," he said.

"I think they have quite a few players who can do exactly the same.

"Eoin Morgan - and (Craig) Kieswetter at the top - these guys can be consistent and shine all the way through the tournament.

"It doesn't have to be a batsman who wins it either it might be Steven Finn or Swanny [Graeme Swann] who wins the 'World Cup' for England.

"There are so many players in that side who are match-winners, who could win the 'World Cup' for England."

PA

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in