Essex grateful for Grayson's grit

Lancashire 423 Essex 236 and 334-8 Match drawn

Iain Fletcher
Sunday 26 August 2001 00:00 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

One man who has prospered throughout Essex's turbulent season is Paul Grayson. He passed 1,000 Championship runs during this innings, his fifth Championship century of the season, and ensured that Lancashire remained a candidate for relegation.

It had not looked that way when Ronnie Irani had succumbed early to the medium- pace swing of Joe Scuderi with Essex still 72 runs adrift. The wicket, slow from day one, was still playing true, however, and Grayson batted with sense and some skill.

As hard as the Lancashire bowlers tried, they received very little help from the surface. Andrew Flintoff looked the most threatening, his brute strength making one ball bounce on Jamie Foster, and Neil Fairbrother took a thrilling, diving catch head high to his left.

For that one ball the game resembled good first-class cricket. A bowler charged in and bowled a quick ball just short of a length which bounced, took the edge off a defensive stroke and was well caught. For the rest of the first two sessions, though, the pitch dominated. There was little bounce or pace and when it turned it did so slowly, allowing the batter time to adjust. During the first day Flintoff had opined that "one more victory should keep us up but it might not come here – wicket's too slow''.

Lack of pace is a problem that many festival grounds suffer from, and laudable as it is to spread cricket around the shires, it is a pointless exercise if the pitches are not good enough. Having said that, Colchester is one of the better ones. It does not break up or have variable bounce, it just needs to be a yard or two quicker. If it was, Essex could play here more often because there are few more agreeable settings. Grayson enjoyed it, anyway, but his season has been one long rearguard action. He goes about his business in an unfussed manner, hitting the bad ball and blocking the good, and without his stubbornness Essex would have lost by lunchtime.

He played a couple of false shots, one committed off the left-arm spin of Gary Keedy, but rarely looked like getting out. Maybe if Chris Schofield had been more consistent in length or Keedy more adventurous with flight, Lancashire could have dislodged him and forced the win. They weren't, and they didn't.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in