Critics ruffle Caddick over refusal to tour
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Andrew Caddick had every right to stay with his family rather than accept the routine risks of world travel, and accept a tour of India becoming so secure the chances are that there will soon be the appointment of a 13th man to test the drinks.
But he was wrong to question the parallel right of leader writers to question whether he should ever play for England again. In a long, intriguing, if sometimes befuddling, account of why he refused to tour, Caddick sneeringly granted the right of his critics to operate from behind the security of their computer screens. The journalistic trade, heaven knows, is not above criticism but in one area at least it passes muster rather well.
In 30-odd years in the game I have never known of a case of a hack refusing to get on a plane. There has, it is true, been the occasion when getting off it has been more of a difficulty, but that is of course an entirely different matter.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments