Caddick attacks selectors over Pattinson 'shambles'

Colin Crompton
Friday 25 July 2008 00:00 BST
Comments
(GETTY IMAGES)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The former England bowler Andrew Caddick has criticised the England selectors after their controversial choice of Darren Pattinson to play in the second Test.

The England coach, Peter Moores, had hoped Pattinson's use of swing would come into its own at Headingley, and more obvious candidates like Simon Jones, Steve Harmison and Matthew Hoggard were overlooked, despite the fact that the Nottinghamshire bowler had played only 11 first-class matches.

"It's quite astonishing these things are happening these days and it's quite a kick in the guts," the Somerset vice-captain said. "It doesn't say much about the system. I think it's disgusting but it just sums up the lack of commitment by the England selectors for the cause. "He [Pattinson] could end up being another one-Test wonder which is a shame for him as it's not going to do his confidence any good. It's just a shambles really that things like this are happening at this level."

Caddick, who took 234 Test wickets, including 13 five-wicket hauls, rejected Moores' explanation that Pattinson's style was suited to the ground, especially with Hoggard ready to bowl on his home wicket.

"Why wasn't Matthew Hoggard picked?" Caddick wondered. "It beggars belief, really. I hope someone would have rung him and explained the situation but, knowing the way the situation works, I don't think they would [have] and that's the sad situation. There's no communication as far as England [are] concerned."

Pattinson's new England team-mate Andrew Flintoff, meanwhile, said he would not push for an immediate return to the No 6 berth after batting at No 7 at Headingley. "I am pleased batting at seven," he said. "The only way I will force my way up the order is by scoring runs."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in