Cricket: Spinner's action under scrutiny

Saturday 16 January 1999 01:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

SRI LANKAN spinner Muttiah Muralitharan faces a match against England in Adelaide next Saturday which may prove decisive for his career.

Muralitharan's whippy action is again under the spotlight in Australia, although Carlton and United series referee Peter van der Merwe insists there have been no complaints.

The bowler, who has signed to play for Lancashire next season, was no- balled by umpire Ross Emerson in a one-day international in early 1996. And Emerson will be standing in the England v Sri Lanka day-night match along with Tony McQuillan, who was Emerson's partner in the match three years ago.

At least two Australian umpires are believed to have expressed doubts about Muralitharan's action.

"If there is somebody with an action that is curious then you talk about it in the normal course of events," said former South African Test captain Van der Merwe.

"Umpires and the referee discuss things that happen on the cricket field, but there has been no complaint. I've got an opinion but it would be wrong of me to make that public at the moment. This whole thing is being media- led. I expected it to come up again because Murali, with his action, is always going to invoke comment."

Van der Merwe must file a routine report at the end of the tournament, when he can comment on Muralitharan's bowling style.

The International Cricket Council has an advisory panel on the subject of bowling actions which includes Kapil Dev, Michael Holding, John Reid and Bob Simpson.

If a bowler's action is considered suspect he is filmed and video copies are sent to committee members to scrutinise.

Muralitharan was no-balled seven times by Australian Darrell Hair in the Melbourne Test on Boxing Day in 1996. Hair voluntarily stood down from officiating in Sri Lanka's matches in the current event.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in