Cricket: Salisbury's best all but ends Essex title hopes

Derek Pringle
Monday 16 September 1996 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sussex 363 and 417-8 dec Essex 360 and 283 Sussex win by 137 runs

Another challenge for the title has been expunged in all but remote technicality, and Leicestershire will rest easier after Essex's failure to beat Sussex at home yesterday. Set 421 to win off a minimum of 71 overs, the home side fell apart in the middle, Ian Salisbury taking a career- best 8 for 75 as risks against the turning ball proved too costly to sustain.

For Essex, the disappointment will not be easy to swallow, particularly as another new dawn fades to grey. Although pedantic mathematical possibilities still exist - should Essex win their final match, and either pestilence or flood suddenly descend upon Grace Road - only Kent now realistically have the beating of the Midlands county, should this weekend's weather set fair.

Essex's run chase was a big ask in any language, let alone in the dropped aitches that accompanied former glories. The pitch, so good for three days, yesterday began to help the spinners. Apart from failing to win the toss and thereby take the last bowl on this slowly eroding surface, Essex have little to admonish themselves over.

However, for Salisbury, who had confined himself almost solely to bowling around the wicket in the first innings, the pitch's extra purchase proved heartening. For one thing, he was more positive yesterday, starting over the wicket and continuing, despite Essex's thunderous start which saw the hundred posted in the 14th over.

He stayed over too, gaining the prestigious scalp of Stuart Law with a masterful delivery that pitched middle and hit the top of off. The Australian returned to the pavilion with the kind of quizzical look normally associated with those bamboozled by Shane Warne.

In the past, Essex have always been sustained over big last- innings totals by centuries from their batting grand master Graham Gooch. Although he began well, dispatching the seam of James Kirtley and Vasbert Drakes with the disdain of his youth, a misjudgment against Salisbury - a top-edged sweep - cost him his wicket.

It meant that Essex now relied upon Nasser Hussain and Law. Both began well, with Hussain cutting sweetly and Law plundering a six and two fours off Salisbury. Both, however, perished as the run rate began to climb, Law's exit prompting a collapse that saw Essex lose three wickets with the score on 167, including that of Ronnie Irani for a third-ball duck.

Only a Pyrrhic half-century by Robert Rollins prevented complete capitulation, as the draw and its extra three points were given little consideration.

In truth, Essex lost their chance by allowing Sussex to add 82 runs to their overnight score. Apart from a couple of umpiring decisions that irked them, each run pricked as sharp as the seaxes on their sweaters. That pain is sure to haunt them should Leicestershire and Kent stumble in a few days' time.

TOP OF THE TABLE

P W L D Bat Bwl Tot

Leics 16 9 1 6 53 57 272

Surrey 16 8 1 7 49 60 258

Kent 16 9 1 6 47 48 257

Essex 16 8 4 4 54 55 249

Remaining fixtures:

Leicestershire

19 Sept: Middlesex (h).

Surrey

19 Sept: Worcestershire (h).

Kent

19 Sept: Gloucestershire (a).

Essex

19 Sept: Glamorgan (h).

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in