Cricket: Kent sad at soggy farce

Glenn Moore
Wednesday 25 May 1994 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Warwickshire bt Kent 5-4 in bowl-out

THE BLAME for Kent's exit from the Benson and Hedges Cup quarter-finals will fall on Nigel Llong, but the responsibility lay elsewhere with their opponents, Warwickshire, and the Test and County Cricket Board regulations, which reduced this tie to a farce.

Llong, an occasional bowler, missed with both his deliveries to give Warwickshire a 5-4 win in the bowl-out, after a wet pitch and surrounds prevented play either Tuesday or yesterday.

Amid mounting tension, all the first nine bowlers scored one hit from two attempts but Llong (who, according to the Kent captain, Mark Benson, had been the best in practice) failed to follow suit.

While not exactly Costa del Brum, there was certainly enough dry weather on Tuesday for some play, but the pitch was wet after Warwickshire left the 'Brumbrella' cover off on Saturday to assist treatment of a fungal infection which was preventing grass growth on the Test wicket.

Kent have formally complained to Lord's about the ground conditions. The possibility of playing elsewhere, only briefly entertained, should have been more fully investigated, but the best alternative would have been to re-arrange the match, as both sides are free next Tuesday and Wednesday.

Lord's, however, would not allow that, so it was into the indoor nets - except, that is, for the spectators present, who were excluded.

Even then, there was an element of farce. The nets were also wet after being washed earlier in the day, and were only usable after being dried out by industrial heaters. The real roasting belongs elsewhere.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in