Conflict on the agenda: What the annual meeting will decide

Paul Trow
Saturday 05 July 1997 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The annual general meeting of the Rugby Football Union is normally a good-natured gathering of England's senior administrators. Occasionally there is a debate and sometimes the exchanges are robust but, like the most keenly contested match, the antagonists are always the best of friends afterwards in the bar.

Friday's get-together at the London Hilton Hotel, however, threatens to be as much of a departure from tradition as was the game's conversion to professionalism. The top end of English rugby is bitterly split into two factions. On the one side is Cliff Brittle, the chairman of the RFU's executive committee, who claims to represent grass-roots interest and is supported by, among others, the triumphant Lions manager Fran Cotton. In the other corner is the majority of the executive committee who have put forward one of their own, Bob Rogers, as an alternative chairman. In the middle is Tony Hallett, the RFU's secretary and its chief executive designate.

After months of public sniping in a war of words which has become increasingly personal and vitriolic, this week's AGM should decide which opponent is victorious. At issue is an accusation that Hallett deliberately misled Brittle before last year's AGM over the RFU's abortive pounds 87.5m TV deal with BSkyB which nearly resulted in England's expulsion from the Five Nations' Championship.

On the agenda is a proposal from Brittle supporters that the chairman of the executive committee, or management board as it is to become, should have "full authority to represent the Union ... and shall oversee the chief executive in the discharge of his delegated duties and responsibilities". The Brittle camp also want the chief executive's job to be advertised with a selection panel set up to handle the applications; an independent inquiry into how the RFU conducts commercial negotiations such as the BSkyB deal; and justifications to be given for the RFU's recent legal and PR fees.

Whatever the outcome, the wounds will take time to heal and the bar afterwards is unlikely to be its usual haven of conviviality.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in