Comment: A nation of whingers?

Sunday 07 November 1993 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

IT HAS become a commonplace among sports journalists to accuse the All Blacks of cheating. The New Zealanders' alleged sins range from mere gamesmanship - time-wasting, or obstructing opponents by returning too slowly from offside positions - to acts of violence which verge on the criminal, most notably the disgraceful raking last week of Philip de Glanville's eye.

Are the charges justified? On the whole, yes. The late tackles, the crooked feeds at scrums, the interference at the line-outs and the infringements which conveniently concede penalties rather than risk tries have been there for all to see. Before we raise too loud an outcry, though, there are a couple of points worth pondering.

The first is that, while the All Blacks do cheat, their opponents are not all white. The harsh fact is that modern top- class rugby is riddled with cheating - in Britain as much as anywhere else. Somewhere between school level and League level, nearly every player learns that you cannot win much line-out ball, or scrum ball, or even loose ball, by conscientiously obeying the laws of the game. Some also learn to obstruct, to intimidate and even to inflict deliberate injury in pursuit of victory.

No coaching manual explicitly recommends such practices, yet how many British club sides can honestly claim that none of their players is guilty of them? The elevation of winning above the mere satisfaction of playing the game has made what the commentators euphemistically call 'skulduggery' inevitable. Everyone cheats. The All Blacks are just better at it than we are (as they are at most other things).

The second point is that the current outcry against the All Blacks has an uncomfortably familiar ring to it. How did we react when England's footballers were trounced by the Netherlands? Graham Taylor, for once, caught the mood of the nation: 'The referee has not applied the laws of the game as we apply them honestly and openly in this country.' What did we do when our best female athletes were made to look ordinary at the World Championships by a bunch of unknowns from China? Accuse them of cheating, of course - just as we accused the Pakistani fast bowlers who humiliated our batsmen last year. Even Turkish policemen, it seems, don't play fair.

Accusing foreigners of cheating has become a national habit. Perhaps it is not an entirely new one; it is certainly not an attractive one. Nor is it a constructive response to our various sporting shortcomings. Ten years ago, it was fashionable to denigrate the British for producing 'good losers'. A good loser, the cliche went, is a loser; we want winners. Today, we have lost our ability to lose with good grace. We have not become any better at winning. Bad losers are losers too.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in