Boxing: Eubank in hot water
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Chris Eubank has been criticised by a leading British boxing official after claiming he should have "killed" Steve Collins when they met in their first World Boxing Organisation title fight over two years ago.
The general secretary of the British Boxing Board of Control, John Morris, warned that Eubank's remarks - made on Channel Five's Live and Dangerous programme - may lead to an official reprimand or fine.
The former champion had been talking about the loss of his unbeaten record to Collins in their WBO super-middleweight title fight in March 1995.
Four years earlier, Eubank inflicted so much damage on Michael Watson that he is still confined to a wheelchair and Eubank felt he had been too cautious after that.
"It was very human of me to feel not guilt, not remorse, but caution," Eubank said. "It was very good of me to be cautious when fighting fighters after that fight. But in hindsight I should not have been cautious - that is the business.
"It will sound bad and callous, but years after - and I came to this understanding after I let Steve Collins get away after I knocked him down and didn't go after him - I didn't want to kill him. But I should have killed him. Or let me use different words - his life is not more important than my career. In boxing, a man's life is not more important than [another] man's career."
Morris said: "Any comments from anyone that refers to death in the ring fills me with horror and anger. I do not believe that is warranted in any circumstances, in any sport. This sounds very stupid and if it is brought officially to our attention, we will have to consider what action will be taken."
Eubank yesterday insisted he did not mean any offence. "Perhaps I should have used another word, but it was not meant to be taken literally. It was just a figure of speech, meaning to win at all costs, and if a man gets hurt, that is the nature of the business.
"It was not meant to sound callous. I was talking about the intellect and attitude you have got to have in order to be ruthless. But when I use these words, it creates controversy. When you are honest, you get into trouble."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments