Athletics: Supplements may be `spiked'
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.THE CHIEF doping expert of the International Amateur Athletic Federation, Professor Arne Ljungqvist, suggested yesterday that veteran athletes who had tested positive for the banned steroid nandrolone recently may have been taking impure food supplements in order to prolong their careers, writes Mike Rowbottom.
In a statement that will have particular resonance to Linford Christie and Merlene Ottey, both facing doping charges at the age of 39, Ljungqvist added that the more that becomes known about the drug test failures, the more it suggests that the athletes' problems "could stem from food supplements spiked with nandrolone. They may be taken totally inadvertently.
"The seeming epidemic spread of these cases can be explained by the presence of nandrolone precursors found in food supplements. These are like building blocks which, when you put them together, can make a positive finding. These food supplements may not have been labelled."
Georgio Reineri, the IAAF spokesman, said that such cases could produce legal difficulties. "We have a situation where athletes may have taken something forbidden and there is nothing on the label to say so. They face a ban, because in our rules the athlete is responsible for what is in their body. But from a legal point of view some problems can arise."
Meanwhile Christine Arron, France's European 200 metres champion, has spoken out against what she believes is widespread abuse of doping within the sport.
"I think there are athletes, including young ones, who are taking drugs," she said. "You see some athletes clocking fabulous times, and they fly on to another meeting and do it again. I don't know how they do it. I can't - I need time to recuperate. There are always people around me that think I have taken drugs. But I have a clear conscience. I have got where I am through hard work. The rules have to be consistent, or they are useless."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments