Athletics: IAAF backs British team: Modahl's points to stand

Mike Rowbottom
Monday 05 September 1994 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

BRITAIN'S decision to allow their women to compete in this weekend's World Cup received belated official backing from the sport's international governing body yesterday.

The International Amateur Athletic Federation had hinted that Britain had a moral duty to withdraw from the Crystal Palace meeting if Diane Modahl - whose performance was crucial to Britain's qualification - became liable for a retrospective four- year ban following last week's second test on a sample she provided on 18 June.

The British position is that no withdrawal could be made while Modahl awaits a further hearing. Istvan Gyulai, the IAAF general secretary, conceded that the British decision was 'legally not incorrect'.

'I have chosen my words carefully after studying the legal situation,' Gyulai said. 'Regrettably for Britain, the end result may still be the same, that is they will have their results annulled. But they are not incorrect to compete.

'At the present time, and until she is banned following a hearing, her suspension dates from 30 August, the date of the second test. If she is subsequently found guilty, the date of any ban starts from the date of the first test - 18 June. Anything she did after that date will be annulled, but at the moment, her results from after 18 June stand.'

That means that the maximum points she earned for Britain by winning the European Cup 800m eight days later currently stand.

The International Olympic Committee's medical chief, Prince Alexandre de Merode, has called the nine and a half week delay in notifying the British Athletic Federation of Modahl's initial positive test as 'intolerable' and has pledged to tighten up procedures.

De Merode said the IOC would put pressure on accredited laboratories to speed up their processes and hesaid talks would be held with governments in an effort to get them to accept the IOC banned drugs list and not to enforce different standards.

The IOC has also adopted clear guidelines to athletes and federations in a long-awaited and far-reaching medical code. It lists all banned substances as well as acceptable medications and lays down standard penalties for offenders in a 78-page document which De Merode described as the 'cornerstone' of the doping battle.

This initiative has been mirrored in Britain, where the BAF is setting up a database of what medicines can safely be taken. The database can be accessed by athletes through High Street chemists.

Borzov joins IOC, page 41

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in