Leading article: Vindictive justice
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A 79-year-old man languishes behind bars, where he has been for the past eight years. His health is shot and he cannot walk unaided. His crime was committed in 1963 and he is no longer a threat to anyone. And last week, the Parole Board recommended his early release.
Normally, those would be considered sufficient grounds for granting parole but not, it seems, in the case of Ronnie Biggs. Yesterday, the Justice Secretary, Jack Straw, announced that he would be rejecting the Parole Board's recommendation to free the ailing Great Train Robber. According to Mr Straw: "Biggs chose not to obey the law and respect the punishments given to him – the legal system in this country deserves more respect than this."
No doubt it does. But the vindictive treatment of a frail old man whose greatest offence, whatever else Mr Straw says, was to cock a snook at the British police for several decades hardly reflects well on our legal system either.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments