Leading article: Towards a credible exam system

 

Friday 24 August 2012 23:45 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

In a rational world, a 0.4 percentage point drop in the number of students getting top grade passes in an exam in any given year should not be a cause for national alarm.

In fact, in the words of John Cridland, the director general of the CBI, it could help to restore the exam's credibility after 24 successive years of rises. The case for defending the drop in the A* to C grade pass rate at GCSE is immeasurably strengthened when you consider that a large part of the fall reflects a toughening of the science exam after Ofqual, the regulator, concluded that it was not demanding enough for students.

There must, though, be a question mark over the decision by exam boards to raise the grade boundaries for a C grade in English at the last minute. This left many students, who would probably have earned a C had they taken the exam in January, with a D instead. And the rigidity of the system makes them ineligible to take up the provisional college or sixth-form places they were offered.

And while it may have been cack-handed of the exam boards – to put it mildly – to have done this in the way they did, there is an issue here. Because the C/D difference can determine a student's future, especially in maths and English, those who are on the borderline tend to occupy a disproportionate amount of teachers' time – sometimes to the detriment of pushing those students who end up with a B grade harder. No less crucially, that same C/D difference also determines the school's future. If it fails to reach the Education Secretary's floor target of 40 per cent of all pupils gaining five A* to C grade passes, including maths and English, the head could be sacked and the school required to assume academy status.

It may be worth revisiting that stipulation, at least this year, in the light of the late grading change. In general, though, for all the complaints of disconsolate teachers, this year's trend both in A‑levels and GCSEs shows an examination system that is at last on the right track – demanding more rigour from students and, it is to be hoped, starting to offer qualifications that universities and employers can rely on.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in