Leading article: Time to come clean on coal
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.It is little wonder that ministers are so attracted by the promise of "clean coal". Carbon capture and storage (CCS) technology fitted to a new generation of coal-fired power stations in this country would answer three of their prayers at once.
It would bring down our national greenhouse gas emissions. Clean coal would enhance Britain's energy security, reducing our reliance on gas and oil from abroad. Finally, it would create a strong source of domestic employment. Getting the coal out of the ground would create many jobs; as would the process of safely locking up the emissions underground.
So there is certainly a case for the financial help announced in the Budget this week to develop this technology. And the statement yesterday from the Energy Secretary Ed Miliband warning that no new coal plant will be given planning approval without a commitment to incorporate CCS technology when it becomes commercially viable is welcome too.
Some environmentalists argue that coal is such an inherently "dirty" fuel that the Government should veto any new power plants that burn it, even if they are trialling CCS. But that makes the best the enemy of the good. This critique also misses the huge potential benefits for the world of exporting CCS to countries such as China which are building ever more coal power stations to meet their own energy needs.
Yet we should be under no illusions about the present state of the technology. Though CCS has been shown to work in small scale trials, it has never been tested on a large plant. There are also questions about the safety of the stored emissions. With such uncertainty, clean coal cannot be presented as an easy fix to the world's energy problems.
Furthermore, any suggestion that, even if successful, clean coal will put us on course to meet our emissions reductions targets would be misleading. Clean coal is just one, potential, piece of the low-carbon economy jigsaw. And the reality is that ministers have barely begun to grapple with the other measures that are necessary (putting a market price on carbon for example) to get us to where we so urgently need to go.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments