Leading article: The police are also in the dock
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The allegation that the News of the World made illegal payments to Metropolitan Police officers highlights the fact that the police themselves are in the dock over this squalid business.
The force's behaviour over phone hacking has been suspect from the very start. When the scandal broke in 2005, the police limited their investigation to the activities of a single News of the World journalist, Clive Goodman. Despite the fact that the notes of a private investigator indicated that there were thousands of other victims, the police declared their work to be over when Goodman was jailed. The Met's acting Deputy Commissioner, John Yates, subsequently told Parliament that there was no evidence the phone-hacking scandal extended further. Calls for the investigation to be re-opened were repeatedly ignored.
Yet now we discover that the police were sitting, all along, on evidence that the phones of the families of murder victims and the victims of terrorist attacks were hacked. The revelation that some police officers were in receipt of payments from the newspaper provides a troubling possible explanation for this foot-dragging. The question of who must be brought to book at the News of the World is important. But just as important is the question of who in the Metropolitan Police will be held accountable for the manner in which they have obstructed justice.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments