Leading article: Royal green
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.When it comes to public pronouncements on science, Prince Charles has a far from spotless track record. His views on homeopathy and nanotechnology are, frankly, rather loopy.
But the Prince spoke sense in last night's Richard Dimbleby lecture. The comparison he drew between last year's banking meltdown and the looming environmental crisis is a good one. The financial community was motivated by a blind rush for short-term profits. And, as we seek economic growth without regard for the sustainability of the planet's resources, we are behaving in an equally blinkered way. As the Prince puts it: "Nature, the biggest bank of all, could go bust."
The Prince, with his many homes, his vast entourage and his frequent flights in private jets, is no ethical paragon. Some will dismiss his stance as hypocrisy, with good cause. But despite this, we dismiss the core argument the Prince is making – for a revolution in our attitudes towards our environmental heritage – at our peril.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments