Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.An appearance at the Leveson Inquiry holds fewer obvious pitfalls for Tony Blair than his grilling by members of the Iraq inquiry. But the answers given by the former Prime Minister today should prise open the window a crack further on his government's relations with the media, and with one media baron in particular.
After all, it is with Mr Blair's readiness to fly half-way around the world to meet Rupert Murdoch at Hayman Island when he was still in opposition that the tycoon's hold on Britain's political class was made manifest.
There are, as we report today, a clutch of questions for Mr Blair to answer, not just about why he deemed that first meeting so necessary, but about the relationship with Mr Murdoch as it developed through his time in office, and at what point it graduated from business to personal – as it appears to have done, given that Mr Blair (secretly) became godfather to one of Mr Murdoch's children. The baptism on the banks of the river Jordan is among the more colourful episodes in Mr Blair's now varied career.
A running theme of this part of the Leveson Inquiry has been the closeness between Mr Murdoch and his UK executives on the one hand, and successive prime ministers on the other. While both parties have been shy about any benefits derived, it is possible to discern a subtle shift in power, as Mr Murdoch turned from courtier into the one to be courted. Was that shift, perhaps begun in 1992 with The Sun's claim to have been "wot won" the 1992 election for John Major, completed by Mr Blair?
The central question Mr Blair has to answer concerns what undertakings might have been given to Mr Murdoch – or perhaps understandings reached – in return for The Sun switching its support to Labour. Mr Cameron, by the way, should face a similar question relating to 2010. But Mr Blair should also be quizzed about any changes in his government's views on the regulation of media ownership and how it was that all News International newspapers came to support the Iraq war. As the first prime minister to set so much store by media-management, Mr Blair should have some telling insights. We just hope his memory does not fail him.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments