Leading article: Playing politics with immigration
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.When all else fails, there's always immigration. That is how many people will respond to Theresa May's apparent determination to bounce this perennially toxic issue to the top of the agenda by flagging up ambitious, but probably unworkable, plans to slash the numbers coming into this country through a range of curbs on citizens' rights to bring in non-EU family members and spouses.
The Home Secretary seems positively anxious for a punch-up. Insisting that the right to a family life as interpreted under the European Convention on Human Rights is being abused, and is not an absolute right but requires qualification, she is courting a battle, both with the judges as well as with organisations like the Joint Council for the Welfare of Immigrants. Ms May is making the most of some notorious cases. Some involve foreigners who have been jailed for crimes and have successfully won the right to remain in this country after their release on the grounds that they have family here, citing Article 8 of the Convention, which declares the right to family life absolute.
Those opposed to Ms May's plans – and especially to the one to introduce a financial threshold for would-be non-EU spouses – are right to point out that hard cases usually make bad law. While moves to ease the deportation of immigrants who are a proven danger to the public have merit, the idea that only the well-off should be able to import husbands or wives from outside the EU will strike most people as unfair.
Meanwhile, it is tempting to see a degree of political opportunism in what appears a calculated attempt to ratchet up the temperature on immigration at a time when, as we report today, the Coalition is dropping further and further behind Labour in the polls.
Ms May has been careless with her brief before out of a rush to grab headlines and sound tough, as we saw in the case of the botched deportation of the radical cleric Abu Qatada. In her eagerness to score quick points with the Tory faithful on immigration we must hope that she does not merely inject a good deal of poison into the subject without having much to offer in the form of useful ideas.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments