Leading article: Parliament must address the right to die

 

Tuesday 13 March 2012 01:00 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

In his application to the High Court demanding the right to die, 57-year-old Tony Nicklinson – who suffers from "locked-in syndrome" and can communicate only by blinking – listed the minutiae of his indignity: he can't scratch an itch, nor clear his own nose and must be fed like a baby. A stroke in 2005 destroyed his upper brain stem, ending control of his motor functions but leaving his higher mental functions intact.

He is arguing that his right to life under Article 8 of the Human Rights Convention effectively includes a right to ask for his life to be ended humanely at a time of his choosing. The court has ruled that he can continue with his legal case. But with Ministry of Justice lawyers insisting such a ruling would change murder laws, his prospects of success are limited. Change will come only if Parliament makes time for a full consideration of the issues his case raises. MPs must do that. As Mr Nicklinson's wife said yesterday, it is no longer acceptable for 21st-century medicine to be governed by 20th-century attitudes to death.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in