Leading article: Communities need money not gimmicks

Monday 23 May 2011 00:00 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

When politicians need an eye-catching initiative they end up heading for the hole in the wall. Tony Blair came up with the idea of getting the police to march yobs to cash machines to pay on-the-spot fines. And now the Coalition is recommending that the public be given the option of making charitable donations whenever they use a cash machine. The idea is likely to be included in a White Paper today, along with other suggestions, such as rounding up customers' bills in restaurants to the nearest pound and channelling the extra pennies to worthy causes.

David Cameron is also due to make a speech in Milton Keynes today in which he will propose an incentive system for volunteering based on supermarket loyalty cards.

Will any of this do any good? A recent poll for The Independent on Sunday found that the number of people who feel that they understand what is meant by the words "Big Society" has gone down. That is what is behind today's flurry of political salesmanship for the idea. But the problem with the Big Society agenda is less public recognition than public cuts.

The scale of spending reductions being forced on local councils is already undermining third-sector organisations and charities which rely on local authorities for part of their funding. And these are the very bodies that the Government says should play a greater role in the provision of public services. Public funding is not everything in the charity sector but it is much more important than Mr Cameron and others seem to understand. So is time. The Government cannot expect charities to leap into areas where the state is rapidly withdrawing. As Phillip Blond, one of the original cheerleaders for the Big Society, has warned, libraries are closing now and there is simply insufficient time for charities or neighbourhood groups to get organised and take over the running of these valuable social assets.

The Big Society is, in principle, a respectable idea. It makes sense to empower charities and encourage people to volunteer to help in their community. This will strengthen social bonds and help to benefit the most vulnerable. But what the Big Society really needs is not a gimmick-laden relaunch, but a financial rethink.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in