Leading article: Another bad day at the BBC

Friday 31 October 2008 01:00 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The Russell Brand affair has claimed its second scalp. After a long and, by all accounts, tense meeting of the BBC Trust, it was announced that the controller of BBC Radio 2, Lesley Douglas, had resigned. Mr Brand himself had resigned 24 hours before, apologising for the crude and obscene messages he and his guest, Jonathan Ross, had left for their planned interviewee, Andrew Sachs, all those days before. Mr Ross has been suspended for 12 weeks – as the BBC emphasised – without pay.

Yet again, the BBC has been true to its exasperating self. As with Andrew Gilligan's Today programme broadcast, as with the mis-editing of "The Queen", as with the various phone-in scandals, the BBC has reacted late, and extravagantly, to a mistake that clearly needed addressing, but should have been dealt with in a matter of hours. That it was not, exposes an organisation so crowded with executives, major and minor, that everyone instinctively flees responsibility.

Of course, in managerial terms, the buck stopped with Ms Douglas. But of all those involved, she was almost the most tangential. There was a whole chain of editorial and executive responsibility beneath her, only one of whom, a 25-year-old producer, has been (unofficially) identified. The requisite procedures were in place: this was a programme prerecorded for a reason: it pushed the boundaries. But at some point the wrong judgement call was made. An individual was in error or a procedure failed. There was a lesson to be learnt. That is all.

Now, the BBC has lost not only one of its most ground-breaking (and reasonably paid) entertainers, but one of its few admired and effective executives as well. Ms Douglas had rebuilt Radio 2's identity and enhanced its appeal; she commanded enormous respect at the BBC and among her peers. It is absurd that she should carry the can for a decision that should have been (and was) taken far below her pay grade.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in