Leading article: A symbolic sign of support for the Palestinians

Tuesday 28 December 2010 01:00 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

In my reporting on women's reproductive rights, I've witnessed the critical role that independent journalism plays in protecting freedoms and informing the public.

Your support allows us to keep these vital issues in the spotlight. Without your help, we wouldn't be able to fight for truth and justice.

Every contribution ensures that we can continue to report on the stories that impact lives

Kelly Rissman

Kelly Rissman

US News Reporter

For such a traditional Tory as William Hague, the admiring biographer of William Pitt the Younger, the Foreign Secretary is conducting a far-from-traditional Tory foreign policy. It is less deferential to the US than might be expected, more assertive in the Balkans, among other places, and more independent-minded towards the Middle East.

Mr Hague's reported decision to upgrade the Palestinian representative office to a full diplomatic mission is a sign of this. It is a symbolic gesture. But symbols can be important, and the action and the timing have raised hackles in Benjamin Netanyahu's government in Israel, especially as Britain's move brings it into line with other European countries that have already done the same.

Israel's annoyance with Britain will be tempered by the knowledge that granting the Palestinian representative ambassadorial status is not the same as recognising Palestine as a state. Several Latin American countries have taken this step. No European country is ready to go so far, for good reason. In the absence of any agreement between Israel and the Palestinians, it is not clear that this move would be of practical benefit to anyone.

Broader international recognition of Palestinian statehood cannot be ruled out indefinitely, however, as some of Mr Netanyahu's ministers realise. The Labour Party's Benjamin Ben-Eliezer recently said he would not be surprised were "the whole world" to recognise Palestine within a year, if the logjam continued. This is an exaggeration. Support for Israel remains rock solid in the US. Rather than "the world" turning against Israel, a more likely prospect is a growing divergence of opinion between Israel-plus-America and the rest.

Such a prospect need not worry Israel while America remains the world's paramount power. The problem is what happens if, or when, this is no longer the case. Thinking Israelis are aware of the long-term folly of pursuing a policy of stalling peace negotiations with the Palestinians, and indeed of undermining them. The same cannot be said, alas, for their Prime Minister, who remains fixated on short-term political goals.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in