Leading article: A dirty and illegal trade

Wednesday 18 February 2009 01:00 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The European Union’s Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment directive, which became law in Britain two years ago, was intended to ensure that such waste was disposed of safely. Special recycling plants were equipped for the purpose. As our report today establishes, detail by grimy detail, laudable intention and actual practice are still very different things.

A sizeable proportion of the discarded goods that people take to the dump or recycling site, in the belief that they are being responsible consumers, is – it turns out – not recycled at all. It is sold in bulk for a pittance to companies which dispatch it to less developed countries for re-sale. Where the goods are not in working order, this is illegal. E-waste that no longer functions is classified as hazardous and may not be exported to countries outside the OECD.

Illegal or not, however, this is what is happening. Non-functioning goods are mixed up with functioning goods, crated and shipped to become someone else’s problem. It is only when they arrive – in the case we investigated, the destination was Nigeria – that the goods are properly sorted. What is working goes to the thriving second-hand markets; what is not ends up on one of many toxic dumps, to be picked over by scavengers.

All this is clearly a long way away from the intention of the European directive. Safe recycling in Britain, however, is relatively expensive; exporting the waste saves local councils money. Always strapped for cash, their duties to keep council tax down and protect the environment are at odds. And the framing of the law makes this simpler. With the distinction between functioning and non-functioning electrical goods easily blurred – and much, in our throwaway society, abandoned when it might quite easily be repaired – the economics point only one way.

At the destination, of course, it is less a matter of economics than public health, even survival. For the pennies they receive from their scavenging, the impoverished children of Lagos and elsewhere are paying with their lives. This is a dirty trade that Europe’s action was supposed to curb, and it is shameful that Britain has any part in it at all.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in