The Sketch: A taste of life under Gordon... more media management

Simon Carr
Tuesday 31 October 2006 01:00 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

It's a taste of things to come. It's what life will be like under Gordon Brown. Half the Treasury team was leaking the Stern report while the other half was following the strictest embargo since the latest Harry Potter launch. In the "lock-up", journalists were patrolled by invigilators making sure there was no unauthorised use of secret mobile phones. Two colleagues chatting by a window were asked whether they were signalling to the outside world. All this while the big dog was actually on the radio barking as much of it as he could in 10 minutes.

At the press conference (the guest list for which was approved by ministers), journalists were present but weren't allowed to ask questions. A man from Shell asked a question. He said: "Prime Minister. Does this suit make me look fat?" Or something.

It's the most serious challenge facing the human race, of course, so of course the absolute top priority is media management.

In the Commons, the excitable David Miliband said he'd do almost anything to combat climate change. Except turn down the central heating in government buildings. No, so far, they are only choosing to do things that can't be done. So, rainforests? Alas, they're "sovereign territory of the countries whose forests they are". Why can't rock stars buy them? Why can't Sting and Thing and Bono and Bobbo and Bongo go off and buy a billion acres and plant palms? Or if rock stars won't, why can't David Miliband?

There will be any number of ways he will explain his inabilities, but essentially, it's just too manual, too physical, too practical. Our political class is thoroughly enjoying this crisis because they get to tell us how the Least Developed Countries Fund for Climate Change and the Special Climate Change Fund will rely on policy frameworks generated by the Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency Partnership. But when REEEP snaps into action, do you get sucked along in its slipstream? Does this cause any pain to our political entrepreneurs?

The carbon trading system seems to be a terrifically good idea, creating as it does billions of pounds for the City of London. We are the emissions trading centre of the world. And while it encourages fundamental British virtues of enterprise and salesmanship, I'll give you 10/1 it doesn't create any net reduction in carbon emissions. Whatever the Carbon Committee comes up with.

After all these committees have researched and agreed on targets and fiddled their statistics and established a mutually intelligible reporting system, do you think carbon emissions will have gone up or down?

We won't know. Because by then we will have demonstrated that our government has absolutely world class media management.

simoncarr@sketch.co.uk

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in