The Sketch: A sea of administrative drivel
Your support helps us to tell the story
In my reporting on women's reproductive rights, I've witnessed the critical role that independent journalism plays in protecting freedoms and informing the public.
Your support allows us to keep these vital issues in the spotlight. Without your help, we wouldn't be able to fight for truth and justice.
Every contribution ensures that we can continue to report on the stories that impact lives
![Kelly Rissman](https://static.independent.co.uk/static-assets/support-us/kelly-rissman.png)
Kelly Rissman
US News Reporter
Now, let there be no more talk of Alan Johnson leading the Labour Party. It's all over. But that probably applies to the Government, too. Both are swamped, submerged, barely visible in an angry sea of administrative drivel.
Alan introduced a glorious revolution that will remake Britain's central institution. The organisation that has, he told us, shared our joy and comforted our sorrow.
And what was this once-in-a-generation change in the NHS? "An increasing focus for GPs" would be, he said, "improving the health of individuals". Doctors are to be told to concentrate on making people better? He dreams the impossible dream. To that end, he promised he would improve the Quality and Outcomes Framework with a "clinical dashboard" to provide data published in annual "Quality Accounts". He promised "an unwavering, unrelenting, unprecedented focus on quality". That's new? Why?
When they talk like this it's because they haven't anything to say. The big idea is "to bring clarity to quality". In other words, more reporting, more data collection, more clipboards, more stopwatches, more faked results, false accounting and impenetrable managerial swill.
New medical directors, supported by clinical advisory groups, will "support the strong clinical voice elevated through the Review". And "a new Quality Board" to provide leadership".
He promised more freedom and more obligations. No new targets, but all the old targets. The highest respect for staff, but (treating staff with casual contempt) his "new expectations of professionalism redefine their roles as practitioners".
The constitution lays down rights but I don't think they're legally enforceable (the NHS only has to "have regard to the constitution" – a different thing from being legally obliged to do what the constitution stipulates).
Do you find all that lights a tall fire in the mind? I see it as kindling for the revolution. There's only so much of this the British public can take. Our mandarins should be careful because they'll get no notice of it. A sudden, massive, metastasising civil disobedience against "the rights and responsibilities of a newly-enhanced accountability". Anyone got a light?
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments