Philip Hensher: The spies who failed to notice a dead co-worker
You would expect a faster response to a disappearance if you worked on a till at Tesco
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The sad inquest into the shocking death of the MI6 agent Gareth Williams has had to be conducted, in part, behind screens. But some things are, inevitably, going to emerge about the secret world of the security services. When the body of an employee of MI6 is discovered in bizarre circumstances, as Mr Williams's was, it is proper for the inquest to try to establish what the chain of events was.
Employees of MI6 giving evidence have not been able to confirm that any unusual predilections of Mr Williams were known to the agency; they limited themselves to saying that these would not necessarily have been a problem (which is easy for them to say). More to the point, following his death, Mr Williams didn't turn up to work for a whole week, including two meetings, and MI6 failed to take any action. You would expect a faster response to a disappearance if you worked on the checkout at Tesco.
The security services have been behind a general move in recent years to investigate the private lives of large numbers of innocent individuals. But listing the things the security services failed to discover doesn't encourage confidence in their ability to handle private information. Politicians were saying at the beginning of the 1980s that one day before long, the citizens of eastern Europe would rise up against their oppressive governments. The professional observers went on denying any possibility of change virtually to the day the Berlin Wall fell. Nor should it have been hard to foresee the immense change which followed the return of the Ayatollah Khomeini from exile in Paris in 1979. Did the Foreign Office or MI6 do so? Did they notice anything was happening in advance of the Arab Spring?
Over and over again, major plots, immense changes slip through their awareness. We are told the security services prevent all manner of things we can never be told about, and only their rare failures come to our attention. When a Gareth Williams disappears from his office for a week, and apparently nobody notices, or a coup or an invasion astonishes a desk officer who has supposedly been observing the region, we glimpse how little, really, some of these agencies know or understand of the most obvious matters.
A few years ago, I had the misfortune to review a "thriller" by a former head of one of the security services which revealed its author's surprising belief that, in Britain, you can hire a car from a major hire agency with cash alone. We are to accept without question that when the services fail, it is inevitable and rare. Still, when we hear about an organisation that doesn't notice one of its employees has gone missing for a week, inevitably, one wonders. Where will the next coup be? Don't ask the spooks.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments